Actually, the last time I played solo was a few days after Buried was released for PS3, I suicided on round 60 and it overall burned me out on solo, and the map itself to this day. These days, I don't play solo much at all. With that said, BO2 was not as coop friendly as BO1. I very much prefer coop, because it is more fun. Although I have achieved more than 3000+ revives on 950 downs, I did it mostly on scrubs and immature imbeciles whom I purposely search for my stats. En route to round 20 solo you amass 500+ kills easily, something coop may require round 30+ to do a much tougher task with far more risks to go down.

During my stints on BO2, I heavily prefer solo in fear of shitting my stats. Getting to round 30 joking with your friends not only redefines entertainment, but with satisfying results. It is the same reason why it's so boring, the game is so linear and so predictable.Ĭoop presents more of a challenge, but much more fun especially with your buddies. Everything goes according to your plans and no surprises. Solo obviously is easier for high rounds and patching stats. I think BO2 was designed to encourage more solo play, evident by the solo leaderboards and career stats, as well as the rage quit factor completely nullifies coop games. However, each time answers are a bit different.

This topic has been beaten many times and twisted many ways.

Single player custom zombie maps waw